Did any party breach code of conduct in elections 2019 in india

It was the 32nd president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt

franklin D roosevelt was successful in leading the US

Answer:

I'm assuming that it could be the third one or 'C' It seems like it's the most best answer and more realistic to say at the very least...

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Hot and dry climates

The other person is wrong

Answer:

The correct answer is D) He was a non-Muslim in a country which is three-quarters Sunni Muslim

Explanation:

Bashar Al-Assad is an Alawaite, an offshoot of Shia Islam which has a very different interpretation of Islam. This is unusual since a majority of Syria actually follows Sunni Islam.

The Quran, which is the holy book for Muslims, is considered just one of the holy texts by Alwaites.

Hence, they are very different from mainstream Islam. While Muslims are prohibited from drinking alcohol, the Alwaites are allowed to drink socially but only in moderation.

They also believe in reincarnation like the Hindus, something that is completely rejected in Islam.

All are reliable except personal history blogs.

The correct option is personal history blogs.

To learn more about personal history blogs, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/11047615

#SPJ2

Final answer:

Humans began to migrate out of Africa around 200,000 years ago. The most accepted theories suggest that humans first arrived in North America between 20,000 and 14,000 years ago.

Explanation:

Scientists believe humans began to migrate out of Africa around 200,000 years ago. They initially migrated deeper into southern and eastern Africa and then expanded north and west towards the Mediterranean Sea. Around 100,000 years ago, groups of Homo sapiens left Africa and began a global migration that lasted for tens of thousands of years. After crossing the Sinai into southwest Asia, they likely followed the coasts of Asia and eventually reached India and China by about 70,000 years ago.

Regarding the migration to North America, the exact timing and routes are still debated among scientists. The two most accepted theories are the Bering Land Bridge and the coastal migration theories. According to these theories, humans first arrived in North America between 20,000 and 14,000 BP, which means around 20,000 to 14,000 years before the present. The available evidence points to the migration originating from Asia.

Answer:

soviet union

Explanation:

Answer:

Soviet Union

Explanation:

Answer: raising of Jairus' daughter and Transfiguration

Answer:

transfiguration and rasing jarius' daughter

Explanation:

Answer:

The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Explanation:

The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) is an independent agency of the United States government that protects you against the loss of your insured deposits if an FDIC-insured bank or savings association fails.

FDIC stands for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Answer: By providing the the basic outline of modern economics

Explanation:

Adam smith´s economic ideas influenced the Enlightenment by largely providing the the basic outline of modern economics.

The idea of laissez-faire which means let go in French, postulated that transactions between private parties must be  free from government intervention. The enlightment idea behind this concept was to restore human potential by returning to a natural order without  regulations,tariffs and or subsidies.

Answer:

the condition of having or being composed of differing elements. (such as people of different races or cultures)

Hope this helps!!!

[tex]Sofia[/tex]

Final answer:

The U.S. is characterized by its ethnic diversity, shaped by immigration and historical population trends. This ethnic and linguistic diversity is mirrored in the workforce, with projections showing a decrease in the percentage of whites and an increase in the percentage of Hispanics by 2060. Ethnic markers tend to fade over time due to assimilation, but the celebration of heritage remains significant.

Explanation:

The United States is recognized for its ethnic diversity, with its population tracing ancestry from various regions around the world. Currently, the U.S. is not only multiethnic but also multilingual with at least 350 languages spoken across homes, which include 150 Native American languages. This diversity has been shaped by history and continues to evolve as new waves of immigrants contribute to the cultural fabric of the nation.

The U.S. workforce demonstrates increasing diversity, reflecting the demographic changes within the population. Projections indicate that by 2060, white Americans will make up 69% of the population, while the proportion of individuals from Hispanic backgrounds is anticipated to rise significantly.

Diversity in the U.S. extends beyond ethnicity and race, embracing aspects such as language and lifestyle. While the markers of ethnicity become less distinctive through generations due to assimilation, the celebration of cultural heritage persists.

Racial and ethnic diversity have implications for social dynamics, including but not limited to, residential segregation and workforce composition. These shifts play a crucial role in the continuing dialogue about equality and multiculturalism within the U.S.

D. Citizens are informed about important issues. Elected officials better understand what citizens want.

By casting a ballot, residents are taking part in the vote-based process. Residents vote in favor of pioneers to address them and their thoughts, and the pioneers support the residents' advantages. There are two extraordinary rights just for U.S. residents: casting a ballot in government decisions and campaigning for bureaucratic positions.

A vote-based system, signifying the "rule of individuals", is an arrangement of government where the residents practice power straightforwardly or choose delegates from among themselves to structure an overseeing body, like a parliament. A vote-based system is once in a while alluded to as the "rule of the greater part".

Learn more about citizens on the political system here

https://brainly.com/question/14636352

#SPJ2

Final answer:

The most accurate cause-and-effect diagram illustrating the impact of informed citizens on the political system would show that such citizens lead to elected officials understanding citizen desires better, resulting in a government that reflects public interests.

Explanation:

The cause-and-effect diagram that best illustrates one main effect of informed citizens on the political system would likely highlight how informed citizens demand political accountability and influence policy by understanding critical issues and making deliberate choices.

Among the provided options, the diagram suggesting that informed citizens lead to elected officials better understanding what citizens want most accurately represents this dynamic. This is because informed citizens are more likely to engage with their government by voting, campaigning, and informing representatives of their opinions, which in turn ensures that government actions reflect the interests and concerns of the populace.

1. Korea

2.china

3.Japan

Japan is the answering question I have to do my homework

C. Ulysses S Grant and his wife

Answer:

me

Explanation:

jk is ulisys grant and his wife

the answer for this question would be word

Answer:

Patrick Henry was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution.

Explanation:

During the War of Independence, Patrick Henry was the first governor of Virginia (1776-79); he also held this position from 1784 to 86. He refused to sit at the Philadelphia Convention (1787) because he was in favor of direct democracy and state sovereignty. He felt that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, and radically opposed the federalist James Madison.

The statement that describes Patrick Henry is that he was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution..

Patrick Henry was the first governor of Vir.ginia (1776-79) and a politician who felt that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, and radically opposed the federalist James Madison.

Hence, the statement that describes Patrick Henry is that he was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution..

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Patrick Henry

brainly.com/question/691671

During the World War II, the US authorities decided to relocate and incarcerate the Japanese citizens into concentration camps. The majority of the Japanese diaspora lived on and around the West Coast, so this is where it all happened. It is estimated that between 110,000 and 120,000 people that had Japanese ancestry were taken into these camps. The reason was that the US authorities feared that these people will spy for the Japanese, and that they will be their ears and eyes on their soil, though there was not a single proof for such a thing.

The Korematsu vs US was a court case in the US where Korematsu was trying to convince the US authorities that the people of Japanese ancestry do not pose any threat to the national security, and that they should be released as they are kept illegally as prisoners.

Final answer:

During WWII, President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 led to the internment of over 110,000 Japanese Americans based on fear, not evidence of disloyalty. The Supreme Court's Korematsu v. United States decision upheld this action, citing war powers. The government later apologized and compensated survivors, highlighting a historical example of the far-reaching impact of executive powers.

Explanation:

The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II occurred after President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 in 1942, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The order authorized the establishment of internment camps for persons of Japanese descent, affecting over 110,000 individuals, the majority of whom were U.S. citizens. This action was based on the fear that those individuals might assist Japan in the war. Despite a lack of evidence of disloyalty or espionage, these individuals, many of them children, were forcibly removed from their homes and communities.

Korematsu v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the legality of the internment on December 18, 1944. The decision was controversial and upheld the government's decision as a means of national security during wartime, although it infringed upon the constitutional rights of over two-thirds of the individuals interned who were American citizens. In this particular case, Fred Korematsu challenged the internment order, but the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that the internment was justified under the war powers granted to the President.

In recognition of the injustice, the U.S. government later apologized and provided compensation to the survivors of the internment camps through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Despite the eventual acknowledgement of the wrongs committed, the Korematsu case remains a significant example of the extent of executive power during wartime and the vulnerabilities in the constitutional checks and balances.

Answer:

option b)

mark me as the brainliest

Answer:

That nuclear weapons can cause a war.

Explanation:

Not even usning the nukes can cause an outbreak of war if the submarines didn't overeact the ar didn't start which is great.

Answer:

37. C

38. C

Explanation:

Failure of landlords to maintain tenements during the early 1900s led to overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions resulting in widespread illness and a lower quality of life for tenants, primarily the working poor. It also led to a dependency on work or school dining halls.

A direct result of landlords not maintaining their tenements during the early 1900s was a worsened quality of life for the occupants, primarily the working poor.

These tenements, often overcrowded and lacking basic sanitation and ventilation, led to widespread illnesses such as typhoid and cholera. Furthermore, the  inadequatehousing conditions led to dependence on work or school dining halls as housing, clothing, and food were scarce. Poor neighborhoods often existed right next to the affluent ones, illustrating the sharp contrast in living conditions.

Many landlords did discriminate, particularly against African Americans and newly arrived immigrants, increasing overcrowding and deteriorating living conditions. Even with regulations aiming to outlaw dangerous living conditions, implementation was often unsuccessful, especially when landlords chose not to maintain their properties sufficiently.

https://brainly.com/question/33726478

#SPJ12

The spread of European languages like Spanish and Portuguese in North and South America is an example of cultural diffusion that occurred through colonization and trade.

The presence of European languages such as Spanish and Portuguese in North and South America today is an example of cultural diffusion. Cultural diffusion occurs when cultures interact and exchange ideas, customs, and languages. In this case, the Spanish and Portuguese languages spread from Europe to the Americas through colonization and trade.

During the age of exploration and colonization, European powers like Spain and Portugal established colonies in the Americas. As a result, these European languages were introduced to the indigenous peoples of the Americas. Over time, the colonial languages became dominant and are still spoken in many countries today.

For example, Spanish is spoken in countries like Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela due to the Spanish colonization of these regions. Similarly, Portuguese is spoken in Brazil because Portugal colonized this territory. The spread of these European languages demonstrates the influence of historical events on language patterns and cultural identities in the Americas.

https://brainly.com/question/28212750

#SPJ12

The widespread use of European languages like Spanish and Portuguese in North and South America is due to historical events during the colonial period, particularly the Spanish and Portuguese conquests, as well as the effects of globalization.

The prevalence of European languages in North and South America today is largely due to colonial history and the effects of globalization. The Spanish conquest of much of the Americas during the colonial period explains why countries like Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela speak Spanish. Similarly, the Portuguese colonized Brazil, which is why Portuguese remains the official language there.

The Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494, negotiated by Spain and Portugal, is a key historic event in this context. This treaty divided the New World between these two powers, giving most of the Americas to Spain and Brazil to Portugal.

The present-day situation is also shaped by globalization which promotes the use of widely-spoken languages as tools for international communication and commerce.

https://brainly.com/question/31630039

#SPJ12

Answer:

The stock market crash of 1929 was the deepest economic crisis of its history.

Answer:

Because it allows only valid laws to remain in force across the country.

Explanation:

Judicial review is a term related to the power of the US Supreme Court. Through that power, judges have the authority to review existing laws and regulations in the country to determine if those laws are constitutional, if laws are not constitutional they will be inactivated. Judicial review is important to prevent unfounded laws from continuing in the country.

Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter was an answer to a message from a group of clergy in Birmingham in 1963. In their “Call for Unity,” the clergy appealed for restraint and “common sense,” and a withdrawal of support for the civil rights demonstrations.

Final answer:

Martin Luther King Jr. chose to respond to the criticisms of eight white Alabama clergymen in his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" because he saw them as genuinely well-intentioned. He used this opportunity to justify the civil rights movement's use of nonviolent civil disobedience and direct action as necessary strategies to combat ingrained racism and injustice, marking the letter as a key text in civil rights literature.

Explanation:

Martin Luther King Jr. decided to answer the criticisms of the eight white Alabama clergymen in his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" because he regarded the clergymen as men of genuine goodwill, whose criticisms were sincerely set forth. Normally, King would not respond to criticism, considering it a distraction from his constructive work. However, he saw this as an exceptional opportunity to address common misunderstandings about the civil rights movement and to argue the moral imperative for direct action against injustice. The criticisms raised by the white clergymen mostly concerned the civil rights movement's use of nonviolent civil disobedience and direct action tactics, which they perceived as too confrontational and unwise. King's response eloquently defended these tactics, emphasizing their necessity in combating the deep-seated racism and injustice in society. He argued that waiting for gradual change had not worked and that direct action was required to bring about immediate change. The Letter from a Birmingham Jail has since become a seminal text in the literature of the civil rights movement, elucidating the philosophy and strategy behind nonviolent resistance.

Answer:

Isolationism refers to America's longstanding reluctance to become involved in European alliances and wars. Isolationists held the view that America's perspective on the world was different from that of European societies and that America could advance the cause of freedom and democracy by means other than war.

American isolationism did not mean disengagement from the world stage. Isolationists were not averse to the idea that the United States should be a world player and even further its territorial, ideological and economic interests, particularly in the Western Hemisphere.

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) low, high.

The debate over economic issues was especially heated during the Gilded Age. In general, Democrats wanted low tariffs to encourage foreign trade, while Republicans wanted high tariffs to ensure domestic industrial expansion.

The Gilded Age in America is the period in the late 19th century, beginning of the 20th, that represented a rapid growth in the United States industries and workers wages increased, and the presence of labor unions played an important part during the process. Not everything was good, during this period the US economy faced the Panic of 1873 and the Panic of 1883, that caused economic problems and political protests.

Answer:

Thesis statement

Explanation:

I think this is what you're referring to

Hello There!

Your answer is “Thesis Statement”

A “Thesis Statement” is a single sentence that formulates both your topic and your personal point of view. It’s great to have a thesis statement as an arguable opinion.

The US drafted the Marshall Plan to help rebuild Eastern Europe countries.

The correct answer is A) to provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth.

The United States devise the Marshall Plan, which gave about $13 billion in grants and loans to nations in Western Europe to provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth.

The European Recovery Program or Marshall Plan sent help to Western European countries after the destruction and consequences generated by World War II. Secretary of State George C.Marshall drafted the plan that sent almost $14 billion dollars to reconstruct cities, provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth in Western Europe. The plan also was intended to stop any help from the Soviet Union that wanted to spread Communism in different parts of Europe.

True, the New Jersey plan gave every state and equal seat in Congress.

Find out more information about congress here:

https://brainly.com/question/535457?referrer=searchResults

Patricians

The patricians were the ruling class of the early Roman Empire. Only certain families were part of the patrician class and you had to be born a patrician. The patricians were only a small percentage of the Roman population, but they held all the power.  

Plebeians  

All the other citizens of Rome were Plebeians. Plebeians were the farmers, craftsmen, laborers, and soldiers of Rome.

(DO NOT ADD IN )

I did this to

ok i think i got it here it goes!

The difference of patricians is, they did not have everything they needed to survive and relied on other members of the group for support, and in the early Republic, only the patricians could join the priesthood, and barely ever traded items. While the plebeians where very big traders, the plebeians did not know any of their law but still got punished from them, and It is believed that the plebeians were children of foreigners who settled in Rome in the seventh century BCE. Plebeians and patricians are the same by, being roman citizens, and very many plebeians and patricians had farms to grown their crops, and finally they all had power many patricians held high government positions, such as senator and the plebeians rose into the government.