PLZ HLP ME IN MIDDLE OF TEST RN NEED HELP 12 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Congress checks on the power of the presidency by

1)overriding a presidential reversal or veto.
2)debating the bill in both of the houses.
3)making laws without presidential review.
4)sending the bill back to several committees.

Some of the prophets that both Christians and Muslims recognize are: 

1) Prophet Abraham/Ibrahim - considered as significant prophet and a friend of God 

2) Prophet Moses/Musa - he is described as a man chosen by God to deliver his people from Pharoah in Egypt 

3) Prophet Elijah/Ilyas - considered as a prophet who spoke out against Baal worship 

4) Jonah/Yunus - described as a prophet who fled from God, boarded a ship, and was thrown into the sea during a storm 

They belonged to groups with a matrilineal culture.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

CHARGE Syndrome.

Explanation:

A genetic disorder causes the CHARGE syndrome. People born with this syndrome often have the gene CHD7 mutated, which results in Coloboma of one eye, Heart defects, Atresia of the choanae, Retardation of growth, Genital defects, and Ear defects. The first letter of the mentioned symptoms forms CHARGE.

Final answer:

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the BP oil spill in 2010 are linked to significant environmental disasters and social challenges, including economic inequality, racial divisions, and the effects of poor disaster management. They caused widespread environmental damage and highlighted issues related to infrastructure and corporate accountability.

Explanation:

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the British Petroleum (BP) oil spill in 2010 are associated with significant environmental and social conditions. Hurricane Katrina is often remembered for highlighting economic inequality and racial divisions in the United States, as well as difficulties in disaster response and management by the Bush administration. The devastation brought about by Katrina was intensified by poor infrastructure, as levees failed to hold back the storm surge, resulting in widespread flooding and a significant loss of life, particularly in New Orleans.

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill, often referred to as the BP oil spill, began on April 20, 2010, and led to the largest marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry, releasing an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. This disaster caused extensive environmental damage, emphasizing the impact of human activities such as deep-sea drilling on marine ecosystems. The oil spill had dire consequences for marine life, local businesses, and coastal communities, elevating concerns about corporate accountability and environmental stewardship.

Both events left toxic residues and raised awareness of the potential for environmental disasters to create long-term ecological and health issues. They underscored the importance of responsible environmental management and disaster preparedness to prevent such catastrophes and mitigate their effects when they occur.

Settlers in the Great Plains faced a range of challenges. Despite the difficulties, many decided to stay, driven by the promise of land, economic opportunity, and the opportunity to establish their own communities. Others left due to the harsh living and farming conditions. Whether they decided to stay or leave was dependent on individual circumstances and personal determination.

Choosing to stay or leave as a settler in the Great Plains would be largely dependent on one's tolerance for risk, resilience in the face of environmental challenges, and willingness to adapt to new ways of life. For instance, homesteaders who decided to stay faced numerous adversities including harsh weather, arid land, and the difficulties of farming this new territory (sodbusters). The decision to remain in the plains was a hard gamble that many were willing to take for the chance of land ownership and the opportunity to establish their own communities, with some resorting to creative solutions such as digging into slopes of earth to create homes due to the lack of trees and building materials.

On the other hand, there were settlers who decided to walk away or failed to make a sustainable life in this harsh environment. This includes the Okies, displaced farmers who had to abandon their hopes due to farming difficulties. The region's typically low rainfall and harsh temperatures made crop cultivation hard, and some settlers found the effort to build irrigation systems too difficult and expensive.

Overall, whether a settler decided to stay in the Great Plains or leave would depend not just on the physical constraints of the environment, but also on their personal determination, adaptability, and the resources they had available to them. However, it is important to note that the lure of economic opportunity and the promise of a better life drove most settlers to endure these hardships.

https://brainly.com/question/839029

#SPJ2

In Federalist 51, Madison compares civil rights and religious rights by emphasizing their need for protection against majoritarian oppression.

He suggests that a large republic with diverse interests and sects is key to securing justice and liberty. This multiplicity prevents any one group from overpowering others.

Madison argues that the security for civil rights comes from the multiplicity of interests, much like the security for religious rights arises from the multiplicity of sects.

He stresses that an extended republic helps protect these rights by preventing any one faction from gaining too much power, thereby safeguarding justice and liberty for all citizens.

Tensions and violence over slavery spread outside of Kansas.

The events in Kansas set the stage for the bloody occurring of the events of the American Civil War, which was fought between the Union and the Confederate states over the issue of slavery. The violent events in Kansas occurred as a result of a political determination of whether the state would be ‘free or state-owned’. The events occurred during a time period between 1854 and 1859. The events surrounded the passing of the Kansas- Nebraska Act of 1854, which empowered the people of Kansas to decide on whether the state would be free or slave owned, by the means of popular sovereignty. This meant that the decision would be based on the opinion of the majority of the population. However, the formulation of the Act led to a violent and bloody struggle among the proponents of slavery, who represented the opinions of the Southern States, and the opponents of slavery, who represented the free spirit of the Northern States.

Further Explanation-

The Kansas- Nebraska Act of 1854 played an important role in bringing out the various sentiments and political ideologies attached to the concept of slavery and helped historians understand the precursors which led to the events of the American civil war. The clash of opinions between the opponents and proponents of slavery soon took an ugly turn when they formed violent armed bands, turning it into a state of war for influence. The violent clashes led to the outbreak of the Wakarusa War, and free- state advocates were being murdered by the pro-slavery faction supporters. This led to a complete disintegration of law and order, and further aggression on the part of pro-slavery factions led to the besieging of the town of Lawrence. The several attempts by the governor of Kansas to combat hostilities failed, leading to the sack of towns and the Massacre of Potawatomie, which was the bloodiest event in the history of Bleeding Kansas. Eventually, the state of Kansas has declared a free state in 1861, and a part of the American Union, a huge victory on the part of the anti-slavery faction of the North.

Learn more:

1. What was the impact of political and legal ideas contained in Justinian's code

https://brainly.com/question/5344838

2. Why did Gorbachev choose the united nations as his forum for this speech?

https://brainly.com/question/4056361

Answer Details-

Grade- High School

Chapter- The United States in the 19th century

Subject- History

Keywords-

Violence, opposition, state of war, massacre, popular sovereignty, state of Kansas, a sack of Lawrence, slavery, Union, Civil War, negotiations, pro-slavery, anti-slavery.

Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution would keep elites in power, endanger liberty especially for individuals, and weaken the states.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification. The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

The difference between Magna Carta rights and those given by natural law is that the Magna Carta gave people more civil rights and limited the power of the King while natural rights are those that people have from birth.

Magna Carter rights were civil rights that had to be granted to people to allow for them to live better under the English King.

Natural rights however, ought to have always been with a person because these are rights that people have for being born as humans.

Find out more on the Magna Carta at https://brainly.com/question/25378155.

Final answer:

In 1918, the main countries involved in World War I included the Allied Powers: France, the UK, Italy, the US, Japan, and others; and the Central Powers: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. Russia had exited the war, while countries such as Greece, China, and Brazil had joined the Allies.

Explanation:

In 1918, towards the end of World War I, several countries continued to be embroiled in the conflict. The Allied Powers, which included France, the United Kingdom, Italy, and the United States, were joined by Japan and other nations from the British Empire such as India and New Zealand. The Central Powers comprised Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. The Russian Empire had ceased hostilities following the Russian Revolution. Besides these major participants, others like Greece, China, and Brazil had also joined the war effort by the Allies' side. Nations such as Haiti, Cuba, and several Central American countries declared war but did not contribute significantly to the military operations.

The concept of megalopolis or  "great city" has been popularized by Jean Gottmann,  Megalopolis, with a capital "M," started from the urban region of southern New Hampshire to northern Virginia which sprung up to eight other regions around the world. What the three American Megalopolises have in common – a region needs to have an extensive network of metropolitan areas with a minimum population of  25 million with intense economic interaction.

The outcome of the US presidential election in 2000 was ultimately determined by the Electoral College. Hence option B is correct .

The Electoral College is a body of representatives from each state who cast their votes to elect the president. In 2000, the final electoral vote count was 271 for George W. Bush and 266 for Al Gore. However, the state of Florida had a close and controversial election result, with Bush initially declared the winner by a narrow margin.

The results in Florida were disputed and went through several legal challenges, with the Florida Supreme Court ultimately ruling for a manual recount of the votes. However, this decision was later overturned by the US Supreme Court, and Bush was declared the winner of Florida's electoral votes, giving him the necessary 270 votes to win the presidency.

Therefore, while Florida played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the election, it was ultimately the Electoral College that decided the winner.

Learn more about  Electoral College here

https://brainly.com/question/1633900

#SPJ5

When the District Commissioner came back from a expedition and learns about the annihilation of the church, he requests six front-runners of the village, together with Okonkwo, to meet with him in his government office. The six men decided to go to the assembly equipped with their axes.

It's possible to infer that the best option for a Democratic system of government is to have full disclosure on the financial holdings of the members of the Congress.

Transparency helps people understand and follow where money goes around the government. Having Congress members make full disclosure of their financial holdings would make it easier for the population to follow on the growth of their fortunes, which could give a red flag if someone multiplied their fortune in short period of time, for example, which could have been made possible via corruption.

Transparency and honesty are important values in nowadays politics, and having Congress member make full disclosure of their financial holdings is a step in that direction.

I believe the answer is:

C. existence of a large rural serf population

the serf population refers to the peasant whose existent is very similar with slaves ( they can be sold and bought) and were forced to work on the agricultural land owned by the nobles.

D. interdependence of lords and vassals

Lords is the one that own the land while vassals are the people who stay loyal under the lords' order in order to do their will. The vassals would be allowed to create a production on the land owned by the lords, but all the result is still belonged to the lords.