Answer:
The actual number of amendments that the leaders first proposed was twelve, but two were not ratified at the time.
Explanation:
On September 25, 1789, Congress approved twelve articles of amendment to the Constitution and submitted them to the states for ratification. This was contrary to Madison's original proposal that articles that could be incorporated into the main body of the Constitution were proposed as "complementary" additions to it. On December 15, 1791, articles three to twelve, after being ratified by the required number of states, became amendments from one to ten of the Constitution.
On November 20, 1789, New Jersey became the first state to ratify the amendments. On December 15, 1791, ten of these proposals became the first ten amendments - and official law of the United States - when they were ratified by the Virginia legislature.
Article I, rejected by Delaware, was ratified only by 10/14 states (<75%), and despite Kentucky's late ratification (11/15 states <75%), the article has never received sufficient approval to form part of the Constitution. Article II was ratified by 6/14 states, then by 7/15 states, but did not receive the majority of three-fourths of the states necessary for ratification until 1992 when it became the Twenty-seventh Amendment of the Constitution.
list three motivations of those organizing and attending the Annapolis Convention.
a. Attendees are hoping to talk about reversal of the protectionist trade barriers.
b. They are motivated by the sustenance for a wider constitutional convention
c. They hope that more states would be represented and that their delegates authorized to examine wider areas.
which of the following was an effect of the french revolution?
Answer:C
Explanation:
Why did mississippi and alabama have fewer formal jim crow laws than other states in the south?
How did progressive reformers bring about changes in government?
Why do these bureaucrats have great influence on legislation and decision making?
Who defended john scopes in the 1925 trial? william jennings bryan david stephenson clarence darrow charles darwin'?
Answer:
Clarence Darrow defended John Scopes in the 1925 trial.
Explanation:
The Scopes Monkey Trial (Tennessee v. Scopes) was a resounding legal case in the United States that put the Butler Act to the test. This act established that it was illegal in every educational establishment in the state of Tennessee "to teach any theory that denies the history of the Divine Creation of men as it is explained in the Bible, and replaced by the teaching that man descends from an order of inferior animals". The Monkey Trial is the most famous legal case in the history of the ideological battle between creationism and evolutionism.
John Scopes, a high school teacher, was accused on May 5, 1925 of teaching evolution using a chapter of a textbook that was based on ideas inspired by Charles Darwin's book The Origin of Species. The trial involved two of the most brilliant lawyers of the time. On the one hand William Jennings Bryan, member of the congress, former Secretary of State, and three times presidential candidate was in charge of the prosecution and accusation, while the prominent litigation lawyer Clarence Darrow led the defense.
Prohibited powers are powers that are denied to both the national and state governments. these denied powers may be found in
Prohibited powers, as mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, are the powers that are denied to both the national and state governments to maintain a balanced federal system. They include prohibited actions such as granting 'titles of nobility' and passing laws favoring one state over another. Powers other than these are classified into enumerated, implied, shared, and reserved powers based on the nature of their allocation.
Explanation:Prohibited powers are powers that are denied to both the national and state governments and can be found in the U.S. Constitution. For instance, Article I, Section 9 prohibits the government from denying a citizen the right to a trial by jury and forbids the federal government or the states from granting 'titles of nobility.' Also, laws that favor one state over another, known as ex post facto laws, are prohibited. Powers denied are intended to establish a balanced federal system. Additionally, the 10th Amendment furthers this by stating that 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.'
Powers can be classified into several types: enumerated powers, which are explicitly stated in the Constitution; implied powers, which are not explicitly stated but derive from the 'necessary and proper clause' in the Constitution; shared powers, held by both the national and state governments; and those powers reserved for the states by the 10th Amendment. This balance of powers is a cornerstone of our governmental system and the principle of limited government.
Furthermore, there is a concept of reserved powers, which refers to the powers not expressly given to the national government and, hence, intended to be executed by the states. For example, states can pass laws regarding intrastate commerce and marriage. Some powers, such as the right to levy taxes, are given to both the state and federal governments.
Learn more about Prohibited Powers here:https://brainly.com/question/30516829
#SPJ3
why did the eastern half of the roman empire last longer than the western half of the roman empire?
The eastern half of the Roman Empire lasted longer than the western half due to factors such as geographical differences and the influence of the Roman Church. The eastern half had a shorter and more manageable frontier to defend against invaders, while the western half faced more challenges due to its extensive and chaotic frontier. Additionally, the Roman Church played a role in the western half by securing military assistance and promoting Christianity.
Explanation:The eastern half of the Roman Empire lasted longer than the western half due to several factors. One significant reason was the geography of each region. The eastern half had a shorter stretch of the Danube River to guard against invaders, allowing them to pay off these groups with their wealth to discourage them from entering their territory. In contrast, the western half had a more extensive and chaotic frontier with more foreign groups to contend with. Another factor was the influence of the Roman Church, which worked to secure military assistance from kings in the west and convert various groups to Christianity, resulting in the emergence of medieval culture in this region.
Learn more about Roman Empire here:https://brainly.com/question/28190507
#SPJ2
which of these statements correctly expresses a similarity between ancient india and ancient china?
A. Both developed democratic governments.
B. Both followed the same state religion.
C. Both had complex social hierarchies.
D. Both offered their people social mobility
Answer:
C. Both had complex social hierarchies.
Explanation:
They didn't pursue a similar religion: India was Hindu and halfway Muslim and China pursued the lessons of Confucius (and those lessons included complying with the social structure).
Which 1936 supreme court case addressed physical abuse as a means of obtaining a confession?
To what extent did the histories of africa and the americas parallel those of eurasia? in what ways did they forge new or different paths?
Suppose the economy is shrinking. This means that total output is _____ and total income is _____.
When the economy is shrinking, the total output is decreasing and total income is decreasing.
Output is the total value of goods and services produced in an economy. By measuring the output in different period of times, it is possible to measure if the economy of a country is growing or shrinking.
The total income is the amount earned by a individual or organization in a year. the more the economy shrinks, the less people have to spend.
What was one of the effects of the passage of the civil rights act of 1964?
what is the world's most densely populated continent
Who challenged traditional Confucian morality in his poetry?
Who were the historical people involved and what were their roles in invasion bay of pigs?
How has history of feudalism actually reduced the level of inequality in many modern european nations?
It was formulated as a custom of state totalitarianism, which set the exhibition for the contemporary welfare environment. Feudalism encourages the reduction in the level of variation in several European countries. Feudalism inflates absolute sovereignty. Feudalism accommodated to stabilize European culture.
Further Explanation:
The antiquated method which was followed in Europe was named Feudalism which was a blend of liberal and military customs in medieval Europe. This practice prospered within the 9th to 15th centuries. It was a kind of pyramid where the people completely proportions obtained from the acquisition of land in deliberation for compensation or labor.
The conventional interpretation describes a combination of corresponding approved and military responsibilities among the soldier culture setting consolidating the three key theories of masters, servants, and fiefs.
An innumerable liberal discernment of feudalism, as illustrated by Marc Bloch, includes not solely the restrictions of the warrior community but also those of all three estates of the realm: the society, the clergy, and the peasantry constrained by manorialism; this is sometimes associated to as a "feudal society".
Learn more:
1. Profit equals the total amount of money made minus?
https://brainly.com/question/10679512
2. How did California differ from the united states in terms of interactions of whites and natives?
https://brainly.com/question/1459888
Answer details:
Grade: High school
Subject: History
Topic: Feudalism
Keywords: Feudalism, manorialism, society , pyramid , proportion , acquisition , clergy , estates , monarchies , liberal , peasantry, Marc Bloc, warrior , community ,
Which statement is true?
A.The Niger River was important for the development of rice farming.
B. The West African savannah produced oil palms in great quantities.
C. Ethiopia had no agriculture until it was colonized.
D. There was no agriculture in the African rain forest.
The correct statement is that the West African savannah produced oil palms in great quantities. This region, along with others in Africa, developed independent agriculture, including African rice, facilitated by the fertile lands along the Niger River.
Explanation:The statement B. The West African savannah produced oil palms in great quantities is true. Agriculture in Africa has a rich and diverse history, with independent development in various regions, including the Ethiopian highlands, the Sahel, and West Africa. Specifically, the Niger River was crucial for the development of different types of agriculture, including the domestication of unique varieties of African rice, among other crops like yams, oil palms, peas, and groundnuts. This agriculture supported the development of complex West African civilizations. Moreover, the well-watered regions such as the savannas were conducive to this agricultural development, with the West African savannah being known for the production of oil palms.
Which of the following choices did not occur in the years following World War II? baby boom housing boom decline in college enrollment state spending on education increased
How much land is washington university in square miles?
The 1820's through the 1830's is often called the 'age of mass democracy'. is that a fair label for this time period?
What is a polis?
city
community
state
city-state
Answer:
city-state
i took a quiz and it was right
After the civil war, which amendments to the u.s. constitution offered african americans the most hope for achieving full citizenship rights?
a. the twentieth, twenty-first, and twenty-second amendments
b. the fifth, sixth, and seventh amendments
c. the first, second, and third amendments
d. the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments
Answer:
he is right
Explanation:
Why was plato skeptical about democracy?
a. Democracy had never been shown to work in greece.
b. He thought all citizens in a country would have to vote.
c. Dictatorships offered more stability and order than democracies.
d. He believed uneducated masses could not make good decisions.
Answer:
d. He believed uneducated masses could not make good decisions.
Explanation:
Plato disagrees with Athenian democratic model, since he considers uneducated people are unable to make good decisions.
Plato advocated a goverment ruled by a philosopher, as the guide for the people who is solely entrusted to carry out this responsability in full.
He then concives workers necessary in worrying for producing what is neccesary fo life, a group of soldiers and warrios to concern about the defense of the city state.
With these necessary divisions , the Plato portrays people as lacking the necessary education or intellectual capability of selecting and chosing what is best for them.
Plato will go on in his Dialogues to argue against the concept of Democracy, and favor the position of philosophers in the political realm.
Who served as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 until 1835
John C. Calhoun
Thurgood Marshall
Clarence Thomas
John Marshall
In order to fight the racist attitude that africans were primitive, what did pan-africanists do at the 1900 world's fair?
To counteract racist attitudes, Pan-Africanists pursued unity, political activism, and cultural reclamation of African history and heritage. Key figures like W. E. B. Du Bois led efforts for African self-determination and utilized African art to challenge narratives of primitivism. This continued into the Civil Rights Movement, which further pushed for African American rights and representation.
Explanation:In response to the racist attitude that Africans were primitive, as displayed in the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair, Pan-Africanists took several measures. Although the exact actions taken at the 1900 World's Fair are not detailed in the reference material, it is known that Pan-Africanism in the early twentieth century focused on unity and the fight against colonial rule and racial discrimination. W. E. B. Du Bois, a key figure in the movement, organized the first Pan-African Congress in 1918 to push for African self-determination. Pan-Africanists also reclaimed elements of African heritage, like Egyptian art, to counter the narrative of Africans being uncivilized.
Exhibits at various World’s Fairs showcasing indigenous peoples in a spectacle of supposed evolutionary stages were used to justify imperialist and racist beliefs. However, the Pan-African movement, by championing African nationalism and reclaiming African history and culture, worked against these stereotypes and contributed to the global acknowledgment of Africa’s legacy, as seen in The Metropolitan Museum of Art's show 'The African Origin of Civilization'. Moreover, African American activists and leaders continuously fought for their rights and recognition, particularly highlighted during the Civil Rights Movement.
Identify some conservative and liberal criticisms of the new deal and its legacy
About how many people worked in the healthcare system in the united states in 2013
Answer: In 2013, there were 855,000 doctors of medicine, which includes active doctors of medicine and doctors of osteopathy, and 191,000 dentists working in the United States (Figure 2). In 2015, there were also 2.7 million registered nurses, 2.3 million health technologists, and 2.5 million nursing and other aides.
Explanation:
Which europeans came to pennsylvania in large numbers in the 17th century to farm the land?
Which of the following was NOT a cause for rising colonial anger against the British parliament and the King? Select the correct response: Debts acquired through the French and Indian War the Proclamation of 1763 the Sugar Act of 1764 the 1773 repeal of the Townshend Acts
The 1773 repeal of the Townshend Acts was not a cause for rising colonial anger against the British parliament and the King. Instead, it was the debts acquired through the French and Indian War, the Proclamation of 1763, and the Sugar Act of 1764 that fueled colonial anger.
Explanation:The 1773 repeal of the Townshend Acts was not a cause for rising colonial anger against the British parliament and the King. The Townshend Acts, which imposed a tax on consumer goods in British North America, had indeed generated anger and protests among colonists. However, their repeal in 1773 did not contribute to rising colonial anger. Instead, it was the debts acquired through the French and Indian War, the Proclamation of 1763, and the Sugar Act of 1764 that fueled colonial anger.
Learn more about the Causes of Colonial Anger Against Britain here:https://brainly.com/question/27819220
#SPJ2