Answer:
All of the above!
Explanation:
Factors that led to the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are Concern over pesticide use, the Growth of the conservation movement, and Concern over waste disposal. Option (D) is correct.
What do you mean by EPA?The EPA is a governmental agency of the United States formed to safeguard both human and environmental health, was established by President Nixon in December 1970 in response to growing worries about pollution and its unfavourable externalities.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) develops and implements environmental legislation, funds and conducts research, and guards against serious health threats to people and the environment.
Important portions of the EPA require any company or anyone that creates, carries, maintains, processes, discards, or imports restricted waste to do so safely. The Act also includes measures for the regulation of certain drugs, statutory nuisances, litter, and genetically modified organisms.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.
Learn more about EPA, here;
https://brainly.com/question/29644646
#SPJ6
What was significant about the defeat of Japan in the Battle of Iwo Jima?
O
A. Japan realized it could not win the war and surrendered
unconditionally.
B. It gave Japan the time it needed to rebuild much of its naval fleet.
O
c. It pulled many of America's military forces out of the war in
Europe.
) D. An air base on Iwo Jima made it possible for Allied bombers to
reach Japan.
Answer:
D. An air base on Iwo Jima made it possible for Allied bombers to reach Japan.
Explanation:
Although the battle was fought during 1945, during the last phase of the war, it was a crucial turning point during the war. Although were heavily defeated, Japanese didn't accepted to surrender. Still, as the States took the air base this enabled them the control over the whole front. It was just a matter of time when the war will end. And it ended a couple months later.
What event led Japanese Americans to be considered a threat to U.S. security?
Answer: Pearl Harbor
Explanation:
Many white southerners feared economic difficulties if
Many white southerners feared economic difficulties due to the changes brought by the Civil War, emancipation of slaves, and Reconstruction policies that were seen as threatening their agrarian lifestyle and economic interests, leading to various forms of resistance and social upheaval.
The question concerns the fear many white southerners had regarding potential economic difficulties during historical periods of significant economic and social change in the American South. Mainly, these fears were linked to the changes brought about by the Civil War, the end of slavery, and the various economic reforms proposed and at times implemented during and after Reconstruction. The economic model of the South, which was heavily reliant on agriculture and slavery, was at risk due to these changes. Emancipation of slaves, tariffs, and other economic policies were seen as threats to the southern way of life and potentially causing economic hardship for white southerners.
Reconstruction efforts attempted to redress the societal imbalances through measures that granted freedpeople citizenship rights. However, the response from white southerners was often one of obstruction, resorting to various means, including the formation of organized terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan, political corruption, and economic exploitation, to maintain control and resist these changes.
Throughout these periods, economic fluctuations and the imposition of trade restrictions added to the tension. The rise and fall of commodity prices, such as tobacco, and the imposition of trade restrictions by England further exacerbated the economic struggles of white southerners. While the elite might have been shielded to some extent, the common white southerners faced economic hardship and became increasingly anxious about potential upheavals to their economic stability.
What did the first new deal consist of
.answer:
The New Deal included new constraints and safeguards on the banking industry and efforts to re-inflate the economy after prices had fallen sharply. New Deal programs included both laws passed by Congress as well as presidential executive orders during the first term of the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Outcome: Reform of Wall Street; relief for farm...
Organized by: President Franklin D. Roosevelt
explanation:
accomplishments of the new deal: The New Deal was responsible for some powerful and important accomplishments. It put people back to work. It saved capitalism. It restored faith in the American economic system, while at the same time it revived a sense of hope in the American people.
What helped bring about feelings of sectionalism in the United States
Answer:
Lots of protests and inspirational speakers and don't forget unnecessary violence and some riots necessary to bring sectionalism into the light
Explanation:
brainliest and thanks please
How does Campbell describe the residents of oudh
Answer:
They don't like to be governed by reason and called them barbaric
Explanation:
Final answer:
Campbell describes the residents of Oudh with contrasts between traditional, pastoral life and the struggles faced due to modernization and urban challenges, invoking themes of transformation, isolation, and resilience.
Explanation:
Campbell describes the residents of Oudh using vivid imagery and comparisons to highlight their living conditions, lifestyles, and societal changes they undergo. For instance, the description of nomad shepherds in the Wadi Tumilât depicts them as free-spirited, connected to their land, with a lifestyle unobstructed by external influences, suggesting a sense of tranquility and contented subsistence. However, other descriptions present a stark contrast, highlighting the impact of modernization on traditional village life. A narrative about a village transformed after receiving Polaroids illustrates a drastic shift from tribal existence to individual isolation, underscored by loneliness and loss of identity. Descriptions of the frail, anguished burghers of Calais convey a deep sadness linking their collective fate despite the absence of interpersonal connection. Another account from Cairo evokes the sensory overload and cultural shock experienced by someone unfamiliar with its urban setting. Finally, descriptions from Khayelitsha, South Africa, reflect the harsh realities of post-apartheid urban poverty, with overcrowding and disease exacerbated by environmental hazards.
According to Adam Smith, the government should only intervene in society for what THREE REASONS?
U may use the internet to look this question up, and get ur answer, and ur explanation.
According to Adam Smith, the government should intervene in society to administer justice, enforce private property rights and when it comes to defending the nation against external aggression.
Explanation:
1. Adam Smith, the renowned British economists, philosopher and author also known as "The father of Economics " laid down a set of rules and regulations in his work "An Inquiry of the Wealth of Nations" said that there are three imperative situations when the government of the country should intervene in the proper functioning of the society to ensure its implementation.
2. To ensure proper justice and equality to the people at large, the government of the country must take initiatives and see to it that justice and equality are imparted and everyone in the society remains content. Adam Smith observed that law and order is something which is of utmost significance for a healthy, prosperous and peaceful nation and the government has got a big role to play
3. The next point that Adam Smith talked about was defending the nation against external aggression or national defense which is an equally important and significant function of the government. National defense concerns the lives and properties of the people at large which needs proper government intervention. Defending and protecting the people from external aggression is of utmost importance and only the government has the real authority to ensure it.
The reputation of the Spanish was diminished after the Battle of
A. the Twin Villages
B. San Antonio
C. Bull Run
D. Stillwater
Answer:
I think the answer is Twin Villages
Explanation:
When was the Great Depression help me fast
Answer:
the Great Depression was the economic downturn that began in 1929 during the Hoover administration and lasted until 1939 it was the longest and most of severe depression ever
How old was LBJ when he took office?
Answer:55 i think
Explanation:
Lyndon B. Johnson was 55 years old when he became president after the assassination of Kennedy, exemplifying the American system of succession and his subsequent leadership in civil rights and social reforms.
Explanation:How Old was LBJ When He Took Office?
Lyndon B. Johnson, commonly referred to as LBJ, was 55 years old when he was sworn in as the thirty-sixth president of the United States. Johnson took the presidential oath of office on November 22, 1963, aboard Air Force One, immediately following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This event marked a critical moment in American history, showcasing the continuity of government and the effectiveness of presidential succession outlined by the Constitution. Johnson's presidency began during a tumultuous period where he would later sign pivotal legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and lead initiatives such as Medicare and Medicaid.
Johnson's ascent to the presidency was a clear example of the constitutional mechanisms in place to ensure a seamless transition of power in the face of unforeseen circumstances. His impactful legislation and proficiency in congressional politics are commemorated in historical records, demonstrating his influence and leadership during a significant era for civil rights and social reforms in the United States.
How did Portugal gain an advantage in trading in comparison to other European nations?
Answer:
The biggest changes were in rigging. At first they concentrated on lateen sails, then added a mix of square sails and lateen for deeper penetration into the South Atlantic, with further changes for the much longer route round the Cape. Knowledge of these techniques was protected by forbidding sales of ships to other countries. A third commercial advantage was Portugal's ability to absorb “new Christians” — Jewish merchants and scholars had played a significant role during Muslim rule.
Hope this helps! If so please mark brainliest and rate/heart to help my account if it did!!
Answer:
1.The land would generate great wealth if exploited.
2.Europeans wanted Asian goods, which were difficult to obtain because the Mongol Empire made trade more dangerous. Europeans wanted goods for the opportunity to make a large profit using sea-based trade routes.
3.Portugal set up trade posts throughout Africa, the Indian Ocean, and Southeast Asia. Military posts also supported Portuguese naval bases.
4.Russia expanded by land rather than water (maritime) expansion. Russia gained control over Mongol Khanates and pushed into Siberia in search for fur for trade.
Explanation:
penn foster
How did Fordism affect American labor?
Answer:
Explanation:
Fordism helped Americans enter the middle class because it gave employees a higher wage so they could afford to purchase the goods they were making. Fordism also uses the standardization of products (machines makes the products) and the use of an assembly line.
What made Japan see the United States as a threat to its authority in Asia?
A.America's possession of Pearl Harbor
B.America's actions during World War I
C.America's opposition to the Tripartite Pact between Germany, Italy, and Japan
HELP PLS
D.America's presence in Guam and the Philippines and its support of China
Answer:
D
Explanation: America hated the fact that China was being invaded and thus made an oil embargo. This was crucial as that Oil was needed for their war machine causing them to use other means that didn't require infantry mechanization. Although America didn't like the tripartite fact and knew that Japan was on a war raging path they simply though embargoes would do the trick. It did not but the very presence in the Pacific with a large navy, new B-17's and a recovering economy was indeed the greatest threat to the Japanese and their goals for Asian supremacy
Answer:
D) America's presence in Guam and the Philippines and its support of China
Explanation:
Works on GradPoint
What was the goal of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party?
Answer:
to replace the regulars
Explanation:
The MFDP hoped to replace the regulars as the officially recognized Democratic Party organization in Mississippi by winning the Mississippi seats at the 1964 Democratic National Convention for a slate of delegates elected by some black and white Mississippians and white sympathizers.
what kinds of projects were done under new deal relief Programs
Answer: The programs focused on what historians refer to as the "3 Rs": relief for the unemployed and poor, recovery of the economy back to normal levels, and reform of the financial system to prevent a repeat depression.
Suppose the Dutch had kept New Netherlands. How might the lives of Africans there have been
different?
If the Dutch had kept New Netherlands, the lives of Africans there would likely have been different in several ways. Here are a few possible scenarios:
1. Slavery
2. Cultural Influence
3. Economic Opportunities
4. Relationships with Native Americans
What is New Netherlands?It is crucial to remember that these are hypothetical scenarios because history actually happened differently, with the British reclaiming the area and renaming it New York.
But, comprehending the deeds and regulations of the Dutch colonial era can assist us in thinking about the possible distinctions that Africans in the New Netherlands may have experienced.
Learn more about New Netherlands here:https://brainly.com/question/17258142
#SPJ1
Final answer:
If the Dutch had kept New Netherlands, the lives of Africans might have been different with a focus on urban and trade-related slavery rather than plantation agriculture, in a society with economic opportunities, religious toleration, and cultural diversity. However, the institution of slavery would still have been harsh, with Africans facing severe oppression.
Explanation:
If the Dutch had maintained control over the New Netherlands, the lives of Africans there might have been different compared to the later British rule. Under the Dutch, there was a significant degree of religious toleration, and a variety of European and African immigrants contributed to a culturally diverse population. However, the Dutch still relied heavily on the importation of enslaved Africans due to labor shortages. With a thriving fur trade being more central to the economy than plantation agriculture, the nature of slavery in New Netherlands may have aligned more with urban and trade-related labor, potentially offering a different set of experiences and interactions for enslaved Africans compared to the plantation-centric slavery that developed under English control.
Economic opportunities and a degree of religious toleration that welcomed non-Dutch immigrants might have allowed for a more mixed society, though the institution of slavery was still fundamentally exploitative. Comparatively, the Dutch mode of colonization, which sometimes utilized systems comparable to slavery such as the forced apprenticeships of Khoisan children, could imply that had New Netherlands persisted, Africans there would have still endured severe oppression, albeit within a different socioeconomic context than the plantation slavery that was common in English territories.
An ongoing labor shortage meant that New Netherlands welcomed immigrants and tolerated religious plurality, including the small population of Jewish people. Enslaved Africans were part of the diverse tapestry due to the labor demands, but their lives might have been influenced by the particular needs and structure of the colony's economy and society.
HURYYYY ans please make it simple *Bills become laws through a detailed and thorough process, to ensure they are fair and beneficial to citizens. What step correctly
completes this list of actions involved in creating a new state law?
1. A bill is introduced in either house,
2. Lawmakers work in committees.
3. The bill is debated on the floor.
4. Lawmakers vote on the bill.
5. The bill is sent to the other house.
6. Process is repeated in other house.
Answer:
A. The Bill Automatically Becomes A LawExplanation:
This is the branch of government that is responsible for carrying out the laws
Answer: The Executive Branch
Explanation: The administrative branch of a government; responsible for carrying out (enforcing) laws. This branch includes a chief executive (for example, the president), executive offices, and agencies.
I hope that this helps you !
Which two statements about the Medicine Lodge Treaty are true?
The Medicine Lodge Treaty was a series of multiple treaties.
The Medicine Lodge Treaty was initially heavily resisted by the Native Americans.
The Medicine Lodge Treaty required Native Americans to live on reservations.
The Medicine Lodge Treaty ended the fighting between tribes and the US government.
Answer:
Option-(A, C):
The Medicine Lodge Treaty was a series of multiple treaties.The Medicine Lodge Treaty required Native Americans to live on reservations.Explanation:
In the year of 1867 between the government of the United States and the tribal system present in the region, who were greatly insecure about there culture, language, and lands inside the United States. Which, made a great need for having a deal to take place between the one who were in power inside the region. As, the different tribes were provided with a specific area to live in and develop as per there own interests.Answer:
a - The Medicine Lodge Treaty was a series of multiple treaties.
c - The Medicine Lodge Treaty required Native Americans to live on reservations.
Explanation:
Was Coolidge more of a conservation or a progressive
Answer: A Conservation!
Explanation: A Republican from Massachusetts, Coolidge had been Vice President of the United States for 2 years, 151 days when he became the 30th President of the United States. Elected to a full four–year term in 1924, Coolidge gained a reputation as a small-government conservative.
Hope i helped have a great day! please mark brainliest!
Compare and contrast the treatment of different religions by rulers of the Arabian empire
In general, the rulers of the Arabian Empire were very cruel and brutal toward other religions.
Explanation:
The rulers of the Arabian Empire were all practicing Islam, and that was the only official religion int he empire, while all others were subjugated or systematically eliminated. Unlike the people that practiced the Islam, the people that practiced other religions were treated as second class citizens, having lots of rights stripped of them, being forbidden to practice their religions in public, and were often terrorized.
Some of the religions that were found in the Arabian Empire were:
ChristianityJudaismZoroastrianismBuddhismHinduismPagan religionsTowards all of these religions, the Arab rulers tended to be cruel and often brutal. The people were forced to adopt Islam or were treated terribly, often even being enslaved or murdered. The religious objects were often destroyed, the holy books burnt, and all sorts of restrictions and taxes were imposed on the people that were not Muslims.
Cause
Effect
The United States and the Soviet Union
emerged as the world's two superpowers
locked in a contest for supremacy.
Which of the following best completes the chart?
O
A. The Soviet Union's population was at an all-time low after the war.
B. The United States had gone through a sudden technological revolution.
O
C. The Yalta and Potsdam conferences neutralized many other world powers.
e
D. Other nations were devastated on a military and economic level after the
war.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Other nations were devastated on a military and economic level after the war
Explanation:
Which U.S. action would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine than under
the foreign policy of détente?
D
A. Organizing a conference aimed at reducing the number of nuclear
weapons in the world
O
B. Providing weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow a foreign
communist government
O
C. Overthrowing a dictator who has committed war crimes against
communist rebels
O
D. Opening diplomatic relations with a communist state that is not
hostile to the United States
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Providing weapons to rebels fighting to overthrow a foreign communist government would be more likely under the Reagan Doctrine that under the foreign policy of detente.
Explanation:
The Reagan Doctrine was a Cold War foreign policy doctrine of President Ronald Reagan, by which the United States sought to diminish the international influence of Communists. Although the doctrine was followed for less than a decade, it was at the heart of US foreign policy from the early 1980s until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
In practice, the doctrine meant US assistance to anti-communist guerrilla and resistance movements in countries supported by the Soviet Union in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Its purpose was to reduce the influence of the Soviet Union and to create the conditions for capitalism and democratic governance. For example, support was given to Contra-guerrillas in Nicaragua and Islamist Mujahden-guerrillas in Afghanistan.
Alternative answer: Funding foreign dictators fighting communist rebels.
In legislative terms, a bill is a proposal
A. that has reached committee for debate.
B. made in the Senate.
C. for any law.
D. made in the House of Representatives.
I think it is C. Hope this helps!
Edit: A bill introduced to legislation, is under attention by government. A bill does not turn to law until the legislature passes it and, in most instances, the official signs it. Once a bill is passed into law, it is called an act of the government. I thought the answer was C.
i thinks its b but dont quote me haha
Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
Complete the following sentences about the antebellum period.
Before the Civil War, the South had 1.____of the total US population. Almost 2.____of this population was made up of slaves.
1.
A. 29 percent
B. 52 percent
C. 71 percent
2.
A.one half
B.one third
C.one tenth
Answer:
b 71 percent
Explanation:
Answer:
29 percent and one third
Explanation:
How did the Atlantic slave trade contribute to the history of slavery? (Paragraphs 2-3)
The buying and selling of slaves has a long history. Ancient Egypt and the Roman world rested upon a foundation of slavery. From the 10th through the 16th centuries, slave markets in areas bordering the Mediterranean Sea featured Christian Slavs from the Eastern Adriatic and the Black Sea, as well as those from Africa and the eastern Mediterranean. The Islamic world in North Africa and the Middle East drew millions of slaves through trade with sub-Saharan Africa. Eventually, Christian societies forbade the owning of slaves who practiced Christianity. Muslim societies did the same, banning the owning of slaves who were Muslim. That ban, however, did not apply to anyone who followed other beliefs. In addition, through the millennia,prisoners captured in war might find themselves enslaved and transported long distances to provide labor for their captors.
If slave ownership and the trade in slaves had a long history, the Atlantic slave trade that began in the middle of the 15th century represented a new stage. It was, as British historian Hugh Thomas wrote, a “commercial undertaking involving the carriage of millions of people, stretching over several hundred years, involving every maritime European nation, every Atlantic-facing African people (and some others), and every country of the Americas.” Indeed, it laid the basis for our modern world.
A. It made it so only Africans in America could be legally enslaved.
B.
It commercialized the slave trade and made it wide-spread.
C.
It hurt the slave trade by losing potential slaves at sea.
D.
It limited the slave trade to only European countries.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The Atlantic slave trade contributed to the history of slavery by commercializing it and making it widespread. Starting in the 15th century, it expanded the scale and impact of slavery to include all maritime European nations, African people, and American countries. This significant shift in the trade and enslavement of people, particularly Africans, has had lasting ramifications that are still felt today.
Explanation:The Atlantic slave trade made a significant contribution to the history of slavery. This commercial enterprise, which started in the 15th century, marked a new stage in the history of slavery. Unlike the limited trade and regional slavery practices that existed in places like Ancient Egypt and the Mediterranean, the Atlantic slave trade broadened the scale and impact of slavery. It involved every maritime European nation, every Atlantic-facing African people, and every country of the Americas.
The Atlantic slave trade commercialized the system of slavery and it was responsible for the transportation of millions of Africans across the Atlantic to the Americas. This trade had an enormous impact on Africa, the Americas, and Europe, shaping the future demographics and societies of these continents. The wide-scale movement and subjugation of Africans have affected racial dynamics and have left behind a legacy that still resonates in the modern world.
Learn more about the Atlantic slave trade here
brainly.com/question/33269208
#SPJ3
Small family farms developed in this country in the Caribbean
The correct answer is Chile
Like the population, Chilean agricultural activity is concentrated in the central part of the country, whose climate is Mediterranean. This allows the cultivation of cultures common to places with a Mediterranean climate, such as: grapes and olives, which serve as raw material for the production of wine and oil.
The Chilean subsoil is rich in mineral resources, especially in copper, considering that about 38% of the world's deposits are in the country. This fact results in the position of first place in the production of this ore on a world scale.
In the industrial sector, Chile concentrates its pole in the vicinity of its capital, and the country's main center, Santiago. Industrial production is generally linked to primary production, such as the food, textile and mineral processing industries.
Expansionist leaders in Japan's military argued that building _____________ was the only way to help the economy.
Answer:
Option B, A Large Empire
Explanation:
Since when the military took over the Japanese government, they looked at building a large empire as the only way to help the economy.
The answer to this question is: Option B, A Large Empire
Need help please
1. Did plagues reduce the population to the point it could not sustain itself?
2. Did civil wars lessen the strength of the empire and weaken the population?
3. Did the army lose its discipline and thus endanger the empire and cause it to be overrun?
4. Did the citizens of Rome become too satisfied and lazy, allowing the empire to crumble due to neglect?
5. Did the empire bureaucracy become too top heavy, eventually causing the empire to collapse upon itself?
6. Did it fall as the result of barbarian invasions?
7. Did the empire spend too much of its resources on the poor, thus drawing away precious funds from the empire?
8. Was the Roman Empire just too big, making a collapse inevitable?
9. What similarities exist between Rome and the United States?
10. Do you feel the United States is in the process of decline as a nation?
11. Assume for the minute that the U.S. is declining in a manner similar to Rome. How would you stop the slide and return the U.S. to its prior greatness?
12. Why did Rome fall? Internal/external conflicts? Explain.
Answer:
Explanation:
Number 1: No.
The Roman Empire's fall was based on several factors including plagues, civil wars, military issues, citizen complacency, cumbersome bureaucracy, barbarian invasions, welfare costs, and sheer size of the empire. Similarities between the Rome and the US include power, cultural influence and shared challenges. The decline of America, if present, could be halted by tackling internal conflicts such as divisiveness and wealth inequality.
Explanation:The decline and fall of the Roman Empire was a result of a myriad of factors.
Plagues did indeed cause significant death tolls, but the population managed to replenish over time.Civil wars weakened the strength of the Roman Empire both internally and with respect to external enemies.Over time, the Roman military did lose discipline and morale, which led to vulnerability against external invasions.The citizens of Rome became complacent over time, some could argue this contributed to the empire's decline.The Roman bureaucracy did become top heavy, but it's hard to say definitively this alone caused the downfall.Barbarian invasions undoubtedly hastened Rome's collapse.The empire did spend a large portion of its wealth on public welfare, but whether this lead to the fall is debatable.The large expanse of the Roman Empire made managing it quite difficult, and many believe this did contribute to the fall.There are indeed parallels between Rome and the United States in their power, their cultural influence, and the challenges they have faced.
Whether the United States is in decline is subjective and dependent on socio-political perspectives.
If the U.S. was in a similar decline as Rome, it would be important to address systemic issues such as political divisiveness, wealth inequality, and neglect of infrastructure.
The fall of Rome was due to a combination of internal decay and external threats.
Learn more about Fall of the Roman Empire here:https://brainly.com/question/9586662
#SPJ11
Explain how the Ordinance of Nullification caused conflict between South Carolina and the United States.
The Nullification Convention met in 1832. The convention declared the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 unconstitutional and unenforceable within the state of South Carolina after February 1, 1833. Decision of forcefully collecting taxes caused conflict between South Carolina and the United States.
Explanation:
The Ordinance of Nullification was caused by the belief that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 favored the North over the South and therefore violated the Constitution. This led to the protest and conflict in between South Carolina and United States.
The imposition of tariffs argued that the U.S. Constitution gave rights to the states to block the enforcement of a federal law. Congress passed the new negotiated tariff to South Carolina. The convention declared the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 unconstitutional and unenforceable within the state of South Carolina after February 1, 1833.