Why do you think that neither house of Congress is allowed to amend conference reports?

The decline of Native American civilizations in Latin America after the arrival of Europeans was caused by disease, warfare, exploitation, and cultural destruction. Devastating epidemics, violent conquest, and the oppressive encomienda system, along with targeted killing of native leaders, disrupted and decimated indigenous populations.

The most significant factors contributing to the decline of Native American civilizations in Latin America following the arrival of European explorers were diseases, warfare, enslavement, and the socioeconomic changes imposed by European colonization.

Epidemics of smallpox, measles, and influenza, to which the indigenous populations had no immunity, decimated huge numbers of Native Americans. The conquests and colonization led by the Spanish resulted in warfare, with catastrophic effects on indigenous populations. Additionally, European colonizers imposed systems such as the encomienda, which effectively enslaved locals and exploited them for labor.

The Spanish were driven by a relentless quest for profits, seeking gold, silver, and other precious resources, which led to the depletion of local environments and resources critical to the survival of Indigenous societies. Moreover, European invaders sought to eradicate or assimilate indigenous cultural, religious, and social systems into their own, often using violent means to do so. This myriad of destructive forces significantly reduced indigenous populations and undermined their social structures, leading to the decline of their civilizations.

The colonization efforts did not just involve direct violence. The Spanish conquistadors aimed to convert the Amerindians to the Roman Catholic religion, sometimes employing a 'repent or perish' approach. Also, authoritative figures within native societies were often targeted for elimination, leading to the loss of leaders and cultural knowledge bases which weakened the societal structures further.

Norms against slavery is an example of an informal institution

Norms against slavery represent an example of an informal institution. Informal institutions are unwritten rules, norms, customs, or traditions that guide behavior within societies or communities. In this case, norms against slavery are societal expectations or standards that prohibit the practice of enslaving individuals, regardless of whether they are explicitly codified in formal laws. Such norms develop over time through cultural, moral, and ethical considerations, and they influence behavior by shaping individuals' perceptions of what is acceptable or unacceptable within a society. While formal institutions, such as the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organization, are structured organizations with defined roles and responsibilities, informal institutions operate more subtly through social interactions and collective beliefs. Norms against slavery illustrate how informal institutions can have a profound impact on shaping social behavior and values, even in the absence of formal legal frameworks.

The complete Question is given below:

Which of the following is an example of an informal institution?

the United Nations

norms against slavery

International Monetary Fund

World Trade Organization

Correct answer choice is:

B. Guateque Campesino

Explanation:

Every culture in this world has some particular events and modes of celebrations. People of Cuba in general and Cuban people living at countryside in particular celebrates this event together with friends and family mainly to celebrate the end of the harvest. Multiple music instruments are used to compose their specific music genre for this celebration.

Answer:

I believe A "Increase funds for civic projects to put people to work" fits the criteria best

Explanation:

John Maynard Keyes is best known for his proposal that when national economies suffer a downturn, governments should borrow and spend money to boost economic activity. Part of the proceeds of the resulting economic growth should then be used to repay the debt.

(The answer above is wrong but verified for some reason)

Increasing funds for civic projects to put people to work would John Maynard Keynes most likely support. Keynesian economics was created by British economist John Maynard Keynes. Thus, option A is correct.

The idea put out by John Maynard Keyes that when national economies experience a slump, governments should borrow and spend money to stimulate economic activity is his most famous idea. The loan should subsequently be partially repaid using some of the earnings from the following economic growth.

According to Keynesian economics, a healthy economy spends or invests more than it saves and that demand drives supply. Keynes believed that governments should raise expenditures even if it meant going into debt in order to generate employment and enhance consumer purchasing power during a recession. Keynesian economics is criticized for encouraging deficit spending, suppressing private investment, and fueling inflation.

Therefore, option A is the ideal selection.

Learn more about Keynesian Economics here:

https://brainly.com/question/28190517

#SPJ6

Answer:

The answer is false

Explanation:

Jesus chose those men to be his discilpes, not his servents, though they were servents to the Lord.

Farmers couldn't fence their whole lands at first. It was too pricey and time consuming. Also, farmers, at first, had no reason to fence their lands until the cattle started running over it.

It was when the barbed wire was invented that things changed.

Fencing became much cheaper with barbed wire than with wood and since the cattle could be hurt and even get stuck in the fences, but for sure not go through, it solved the problems of the farmers.

Answer:

Socialism

Explanation:

Apex

Answer:

D. All of the above

The Hebrew word "bara" used in Genesis 1:1 means to create, to bring into existence, or to make from nothing.

Explanation:

In theory, to create, to bring into existence, and to make from nothing all mean the same thing. If you bring something into existence or make something from nothing, you are creating it. This is why the answer is all of the above, even though simply the meaning of the word "bara" is to create. The word is also used in Genesis 2:3-4.

Explanation:

A bill can be introduced at any of the houses of the Congress. If the bill in introduced at the Senates and is passed by the Senates, then the bill passes on to the House of Representatives where the members will decide and vote on the bill. If the bill is passed by the House of Representative, it is then goes on to the President for his consent. When the President put his signature and approves the bill, it becomes a law.

The correct answer is C, NOT D. It's C because you can't determine anything on about a half completed experiment.

The statement or situation that portrays inadequate data is the third one: Rupal determines aluminum is the most reactive metal by completing only half of her experiment. By not completing the experiment, this student has obtained inadequate data and reached a wrong conclusion. The most reactive metal (the most likely to undergo a chemical reaction in contact with water, acids, and steam, for instance) in the reactivity series list is actually potassium, not aluminum (although aluminum is indeed a very reactive metal).

Answer:

Option B, Martin Luther King, Jr, is the right answer.

Explanation:

Taken place throughout the 1950's and 1960's, the Civil Rights Movement was a fight for social justice. The main motive of this movement was to obtain equal rights from the U.S. laws for Blacks. Though the Civil War put an end to slavery it could not end the discrimination against blacks. The Black community, in the United States and more particularly in the South, was experiencing racial discrimination. Throughout the mid 20th century this violence and discrimination extended to an extent that the African-Americans along with some whites launched a unique fight for equality. In this struggle, Martin Luther King, provided leadership to the Black community and played a very significant role in the Civil Rights Movement. Therefore, option B, will be the right answer.

Answer:

C. The amendment receives a two-thirds vote.

Explanation:

edge 23

Answer:

Between 1500 and 1800 Muslim control of North Africa formed a sort of barrier to European exploration of the interior of Africa from the north. The Dutch were the first to move toward the interior with South Africa as a part of establishing routes to the east for trade with Asia.

Europeans faced severe geographical and health challenges that hindered their advancement into the African interior before the 19th century, such as inhospitable terrain and lethal diseases like malaria.

A main reason Europeans did not make extensive inroads into the African interior before the mid-19th century was largely due to Africa's challenging geography, which presented few suitable harbors for ships and rivers unnavigable by sail. Moreover, Europeans faced the threat of lethal diseases like malaria, which killed many Europeans within their first year on the continent. This period, prior to the late 19th-century 'Scramble for Africa', saw limited European presence in Africa, with activities mostly confined to the coastal areas for trade and resource extraction, utilizing African intermediaries for transactions into the interior.

Significant changes in African coastal regions occurred during the 15th to 17th centuries due to European interactions. Coastal regions were targeted because of their accessibility to warships. The coastal empires, however, had little interest in the hinterland beyond the shores. It was not until the development of quinine, mechanized vehicles, and advanced weaponry, that European nations could finally penetrate the African interior and establish their colonial dominion.

The answer is true because the monks would chant using harmonies and melodies while church was going on.

the answer is mohandas gandhi

A theory is a conclusion that is drawn from observations and experiments, but a law provides an explanation. this is the answer strictly because within science everything can be proven wrong nothing is set in stone